Saturday, March 2, 2024

The Finite Physical Quantities of the Bohr Model of Hydrogen Atom




 




The Finite Physical Quantities of the Bohr Model of Hydrogen Atom 

Pavle I. Premović

Laboratory for Geochemistry, Cosmochemistry&Astrochemistry,

University of Niš, pavleipremovic@yahoo.com, Niš, Serbia

According to the Bohr model, the hydrogen atom consists an electron which orbits a proton The proton has a positive charge equal in magnitude to a unit of electron charge e (= 1.60 × 10-19 C) and its radius of about 0.85 × 10-15 m. The radius of the ground state orbit of hydrogen atom is symbolized as a0 and it is about 5.3 × 10-11 m. 

The energy expression for the Bohr model of hydrogen atom is

 

En = 2mee4/n2h2

where:

 

me = the rest mass of electron

n (= 1, 2, 3,..) is a quantum number

h (= 6.63 × 10-34 J sec) is Planck’s constant.[1] 

We mark with E1 the energy of an electron in the ground orbit of hydrogen atom with n = 1. This energy is2.18 ×10-18 J (or 13.6 eV). The energies of all the following orbits successively with 1, 2, 3,.. by their quantum number n and if n → ∞, En → 0.

The Coulomb force of attraction between the proton and electron of hydrogen atom is 
Fp = kee2/Rn2 

where ke is the Coulomb constant (= 8,988 × 109 N m2 C-2)[2] and Rn is the distance between these particles. This force causes the electron to deflect from a straight line to a circular orbit around the proton. This is centripetal force and it is balanced by a centrifugal force Ff given by the formula meυn2/Rn where υn is the electron speed. In the equation form 

Fp = F

or

 meυn2/Rn = kee2/Rn2    … (1).

The Bohr quantum condition is defined by the following equation 

meυnRn = nħ    … (2)[3] 

where ħ (= h/2π = 1.055 × 10−34 J sec) is the reduced Planck constant. Combining this equation and eqn. (1) we get, after a bit of algebra,

 υn = kee2/nħ. 

This equation indicates that υnkee2/ħ, so its maximum value υ1 = kee2/ħ. Plugging into it the above known values we find υ1 ≈ 2.2 × 106 m sec-1. Substituting kee2/ħ of this equation with υ1, we have

 υn = υ1/n. 

If n → ∞ then υn → 0 and the corresponding acceleration an → 0. 

A combination of eqns. (2) and (3), after some algebra, also yields 

Rn = (ħ2/kemee2)n2   … (3). 

By setting n = 1 into this equation and after some algebra, we obtain 

Rn = a0n2.  

So, when n → ∞ then En → 0, Rn → ∞, υn → 0 and an → 0. 

When an excited electron from the orbit with the highest energy E = 0 J returns to the ground state energy orbit it emits a photon with an energy of 13.6 eV. The radius of this highest energy orbit or the distance between an electron in this orbit and the proton is infinite.  A question arises: how long it takes the electron to reach the ground state? Since Rn → ∞ then the time for this transfer t → ∞.

Let us assume that the energy of the highest energy electron orbit is not zero but it has an exceedingly low value, Ei. In this case, we would deal with ni, Ri and ti having finite but exceedingly large values. The corresponding speed υi and acceleration ai would have an exceedingly low value
When the electron reaches the ground state orbit its speed υ1 would be about 2.2 × 106 m sec-{1} and its average speed would be υav =1 + υi)/2 υ1/2 ≈ 1 × 106 m sec-1.

Premović [1] estimated that an electron situated at a distance of Bohr’s radius from the proton would reach an acceleration of about 1030 m sec-2 or a1 1030 m sec-2. Its average acceleration would be aav = (a1 + ai)/2 or aav ≈ 5 × 1029 m sec-2. 

Since aav = υav/ti find that ti = υav/ aav ≈ 1 × 106 m sec-1/5 × 1029 m sec-2 ≈ 2 × 10-24 sec. This time interval is about 2000 times smaller than the smallest time interval measured to date: 10-21 sec. 

We can estimate Ei another form of the Heisenberg relations relating to energy and time. In equation form 

Eiti = h 

or 

 Ei = h/ti.

Plugging the above value of ti, we get Ei ≈ 10-10 J. However, now we face a problem. We know that Ri = υav × ti or Ri ≈ 1 × 106 m sec-1 × 2 × 10-24 sec ≈ 2 × 10-18 m. This is impossible since, as we noted above, Ri has to be exceedingly large. 

Reference 

{1} P. I. Premović, The Coulomb electron speed and acceleration in Bohr’s model of the hydrogen atom. The General Science Journal, April 2023.

[1] Although the Bohr model of the hydrogen atom has many shortcomings, the energy equation of the Schroedinger quantum mechanical model for this atom gave the same energy equation as the Bohr equation. In both the Bohr model and quantum mechanics, the energy is proportional to 1/n2, according to eqn. (1).

[2] To avoid confusion in further text, the SI units are given in italics. 

[3] We know that meυnR is the angular momentum of an electron in its orbit which is, according to Bohr’s model, quantized. 

 






Friday, March 1, 2024

The Hydogen Molecule and Deuterium Atom in the Light of de Broglie’s Theory*

 









The Hydrogen Molecule and Deuterium Atom

in the Light of de Broglie’s Theory* 

Pavle I. Premović

Laboratory for Geochemistry, Cosmochemistry&Astrochemistry,
University of Niš, pavleipremovic@yahoo.com, Niš, Serbia

General chemistry textbooks state that hydrogen molecule (H2) consists of two protons and two electrons.[1] According to this model, protons exist in its nucleus as two independent particles.[2]

However, this picture does not just agree with the picture of this molecule based on de Broglie's hypothesis of the wave nature of particles. 

The de Broglie equation can be used to describe the wave nature of the proton and the H2 nucleus in motion. Usually, this expression is expressed in the following form 

λ = h/mυ ... (1) 

where λ is the wavelength, h (= 6.63 × 1034 J sec)[3] is Planck's constant and m is the mass of a particle moving at a speed υ. 

If H2 travels with a non-relativistic speed υ its wavelength is then 

λ(H 2) = h/m(H2)υ ... (2)  

where m(H2) is the rest mass of this molecule. 

The wavelength of protons in this moving H2 is 

λ(H+) = h/m(H+)υ ... (3). 

As the rest mass of the electron is negligible compared to the rest mass of the proton m(H+) then m(H+) = 1/2m(H2). Plugging this term into eqn. (3) and taking into account eqn. (2) we get 

λ(H+) = 2λ(H2) ... (4).

The experimental bond (equilibrium) bond distance of H2 is about 7.4 × 10-11 m. Taking into account that the proton is about 0.85 × 10-15 m, this distance is equal to about 43500 proton diameters. Thus, one concludes that H2 consists of two separate protons having the same wavelength λ(H+). 

Let us now assume that the proton waves of H2 interact with each other. The superposition of these waves can result in two types of interference depending on whether their waves are in phase or out of phase: constructive and destructive interference.

In their constructive interference, the resultant wave would have twice large an amplitude as the proton but its wavelength would be the same as the proton wavelength. In the destructive interference, the two proton waves would cancel each other so there would be no resultant wave. Since they are associated with H2 their speed is identical then, according to eqn. (4), the wavelength of H+ is twice the wavelength of H2. 

In contrast, de Broglie's eqn. (1) implies that the nucleus of H2 does not consist of two separate protons but of a particle whose mass is equal to the twice proton mass and the wavelength equals half of the proton wavelength [see eqn. (4)]. In other words, de Broglie’s concept implies that the protons do not exist separately inside the H2 nucleus. As far as we are aware, this claim has not been demonstrated experimentally. 

Most astronomers and cosmologists believe Universe’s formation started with the Bing Bang about 13.8 Gy ago. Atomic hydrogen (H) comprises about 90 % of the current Universe by number density or about 75 % of the Universe by mass. It was created in the early Universe after the Big Bang event. 

In the early Universe, protons were produced abundantly. They were exposed to enough high temperatures (or having very high kinetic energy) to fuse to form the diproton nucleus. This nucleus is unstable and one proton converts into a neutron so that a deuteron (deuterium nucleus) D+ (or 21D) results, releasing a positron e+ and a neutrino νe. The diproton nucleus is, however, unstable and one proton converts into the neutron so that a deuteron (deuterium nucleus) D+ results, in releasing a positron e+ and a neutrino νe. In the equation form

p + p = D+ + e+ + νe    … (5).

This reaction is extremely slow because it is endothermic as neutrinos released carrying energies of 0.42

MeV or 6.7 × 10-14 J. 

The diproton formation followed by a production of deuterium occurs also in the Sun and other similar stars. The deuterium continues in further fusion reactions fueling the Sun. 

In the early Universe, neutrons were also abundantly present. It is a widely held view that in this Universe the fusion reaction of proton and neutron creates a composite stable D+. In the equation form

p + n D+ ... (6). 

The formation of D+ is from proton and neutron would be expected to have a mass 

m p + mn = 3.3476 × 10-27 kg

where mp and mn are the mass of the proton and neutron at rest.  The observed mass of D+ is 3.3436 × 10-27 kg and the mass defect for the D+ formation process is 4 × 10-30 kg which is the equivalent of about 2.24 MeV or 3.6 × 10-13J. The fusion reaction (6) is thus exothermic and thus more probable in the early Universe than the reaction (5).[4]

Therefore, the nucleus of D+ consists of the “fused” proton and neutron containing the total mass equal to the mass of the proton and neutron combined.

Let us assume that the proton and neutron of D+ attract each other by a force FG described by Newton’s gravitation force equation

FG = G(mpmn)/R2 ... (7) 

where FG is the gravitational force, G is the gravitational constant (equal to 6.67 × 10-11 m3 kg-1 sec-2) and R is the distance between their centers.[5] Let us first assume that this distance is equal approximately to the bond distance of H2 about 7.4 × 10-11 m.

The mp and mn masses are approximately the same: ca. 1.7 × 10-27 kg. Thus, we can write mp = mn = m = 1.7 × 10-27 kg and eqn. (7) can be written as 

FG = Gm2/R2 ... (8). 

We know that 

aG = FG/m 

where aG is Newton’s gravitational acceleration. Combining this equation and eqn. (8) we get 

aG = Gm/R2 … (9).

Plugging into this equation the above values of G, m and R (= 1.7 × 10-11 m) we obtain aG ≈ 4 × 10-16 m sec-2. This acceleration would be much higher when the proton and neutron approach each other just

before forming a deuteron [see (6)]. 

The strong attractive (nuclear) force of gravity FΓ acts between a proton and neutron during their 
collision (or fusion) reaction generating deuteron 
FΓ = Γm2/R2 
or
aΓ = Γm/R2    … (10) 

where Γ is the strong (nuclear) gravitational constant Γ and R is the distance between them. However, this force is very short-range and it is only “active” at distances of about 10-15 m. It is reasonable to assume that FΓ would be negligible at a distance of 10-14 m. At this distance, aG would be about 10-9 m sec-2. 

The strong gravitational constant Γ was assessed for several various cases ranging from 1025 to 1032 N m2 kg-2 [(see Wikiversity: Strong gravitational constant)]. For example, its value obtained from Fermi’s weak coupling constant is equal to approximately 6.94 × 1031 N m2 kg-2. 

It is reasonable to assume that the distance between proton and neutron just before collision (or fusion) is equal approximately to the charge radius of deuteron about 2.13 × 10-15 m. Plugging into eqn. (9) the above values for Γ (= 6.94 × 1031 N m2 kg-2), m (= 1.7 × 10-27 kg) and R (= 2.13 × 10-15 m) we find 

aΓ ≈ 3 × 1034 m sec-2. 

It means that between 10-14 m and about 2 ×10-15 m proton (or neutron) would be accelerated about 1040 times. 

This acceleration would also be when the proton and neutron approach each other just before forming a deuteron [see (6)]. With this average acceleration, the proton (or neutron) would reach the speed of light c (≈ 3 × 108 m sec-1) for Δt 10-26 sec. 

The quantum mechanical expression for the energy-time uncertainty is

 

ΔEΔt ≈ h ... (11).

 

This relates the minimum uncertainty in energy ΔE of a particle and its change during a time interval Δt. Solving for ΔE and substituting Δt10-26 sec gives ΔE ≈ 7 × 10-8 J. This uncertainty in energy is about 2 × 105 times higher than the internal energy of deuteron of about 3.6 ×10-13 J. It is reasonable in this case to assume that ΔE is about this energy then the time interval Δt has to be 2 × 10-21 sec [eqn. (11)]. By that time the speed of a proton (or neutron) just before collision (or fusion) would be about 2 × 10-21 sec × 1034 m sec-2 ≈ 2 × 1013 m sec-1 or about 70000 times higher than the speed of light. 

The strong (nuclear) acceleration can be presented as aΓ = dυ/dt where dυ and dt represent the corresponding changes in speed and time. Special relativity limits dυ with the speed of light then aΓ < c/dt or 

dt < 10-26 sec. 

It is generally accepted that the Planck time tp (≈ 10-43 sec) is the smallest time interval that has a physical meaning. However, the smallest time interval measured to date is about 10-21 sec.[7] Therefore, dt can be from 10-43 sec to 10-26 sec. The question is now: Which value of dt is right? 

Let us first assume that the proton and neutron are moving with a non-relativistic speed υ[6] just before collision (or “fusion”). After this event, the proton and neutron move together as deuteron. Their total non-relativistic kinetic energy Ek = mυ2. A part of this energy would be transformed into the internal energy of deuteron and a part into its kinetic energy. As we noted above, this internal energy is 3.6 × 10-13 J. Therefore, Ek > 3.6 × 10-13 J or after a bit of algebra and calculation we find that υ > 1.4 × 107 m sec-1. 

Consider now a relativistic case. The formula for the total relativistic kinetic energy of proton and neutron is

Erk = 2m(γ 1)c2 

where γ = 1/√(1υ2/c2) is a relativistic factor. Plugging into this equation the above values of m and c and having in mind that Erk > 3.6 × 10-13 J we find that the speed of a proton (or neutron) just before a collision (or fusion) is close to the speed of light. In this case, dt is about 10-26 sec. 

Quantum mechanics allows us to write a general expression for the energy-time principle: 

ΔEΔt h. 

This expression relates the minimum uncertainty in energy dE of any particle system changing during a time interval Δt. Solving for ΔE and substituting the above values for Δt gives 

dE ≈ 10-7 J – 1010 J.

Something is wrong but the question is: what? 

Reference 

{1} R. Yang, B. Chen, H. Zhao et al., Test of conformal gravity with astrophysical observations. arXiv: 1311.2800v1 [gr-qc] 12 Nov 2013.


* For the sake of clarity, I have modified the first part of a previous version of this communication which refers to de Broglie’s model of H2.

[1] It is believed that in this molecule the two electrons are shared by both nuclei, so the integrity of each atom is completely lost in the molecule.

[2] The attraction of each electron by the two protons generates a force that pulls the protons toward each other and balances the repulsive force between protons and the repulsive force between electrons.

[3] To avoid confusion in further text, the SI units are given in italics.

[4] Note here that all possible mechanisms in the generation of deuterium are still incomplete {1}.

[5] Hypothetically, this attraction starts from infinity.

[6] Plugging into dt < c/aΓ dt (≈ 10-21 sec) and aΓ (≈ × 1034 m sec-2), we obtain c > 1.6 × 1013 m sec-1

[7] We do not know the speed of a proton (or neutron) at any moment of its motion.




 


On the Absence of Dark Matter in the Milky Way

  On the Absence of Dark Matter in the Milky Way* Pavle I. Premović Laboratory for Geochemistry, Cosmochemistry&Astrochemistry, Univ...