The Cosmic Energy-Time Uncertainty
Pavle I. Premović
Laboratory for Geochemistry,
Cosmochemistry&Astrochemistry,
University of Niš, pavleipremovic@yahoo.com, Niš, Serbia
The energy-time relation of
Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle describes the relationship between the
uncertainty in energy ∆E and the relevant uncertainty in time ∆t for a physical
process. In expression,
∆E∆t ≥ h
awhere h (= 6.63 × 10-34 J
sec) is Planck’s constant.
This uncertainty is noticeable, for instance for physical processes involving subatomic
particles, but not for the physical processes of macroscopic objects such as
tennis balls, planets of the Solar System, stars and galaxies.
a
According to the standard cosmology, the redshifts of the light emitted by nearby and distant
galaxies is the result of the Universe
expansion during the flight of the light from these galaxies to the Earth. The
corresponding change in wavelength is:
∆λ = λG –
λ
awhere λG is the wavelength of
light emitted by nearby or distant galaxies and measured by the Earthlings, and
λ is the wavelength of light supposedly generated
by the corresponding source on the Earth.
The best estimate of the age
of the Earth 4.55 ± 0.05 Gyr. Premović {2} concluded that the time of Earth’s
formation is a more reliable zero-time standard for the Universe. All distant
galaxies were formed before the Earth. Premović used for this type of galaxies
the term before the Earth and labeled it as BE. For galaxies created after the
Earth, he applied AE. Of note, all “megamaser” galaxies are nearby and they were
formed in AE {2, 3}. We will first consider the galaxies born in BE.
In
earlier communication {3} the author derived the following relationship between
the distance from a distant galaxy and the Earth DG and Earth’s age
AE:
DG
= cAE … (1).
where c (≈ 3×108 m sec-1) is
the speed of light. Premović {4} proposed that this distance can be expressed by the following formula:
DG
= Nλ
awhere
N is
an extremely large natural number. Using eqn. (1), we
find the variation of DG
∆DG
= c∆AE … (2).
Obviously,
∆DG
= nλ … (3)
where
n is
a natural number that would be extremely less than N
but greater
or equal to 1. Combining the equations (2) and (3) and
after a bit of algebra, we get
nλ/c = ∆AE
We know that λ/c = 1/ν, where ν is the frequency of light emitted by a
nearby or distant galaxy. Substituting λ/c of the above equation with 1/ν and
after dividing it with Planck constant, we obtain
n(1/hν) = ∆AE/h.
Of
course, hν represents the accompanying change in energy ∆E. Substituting hν in
this equation with ∆E and rearranging, we arrive at
∆E∆AE
= nh.
Since
n is
a small natural number greater or equal 1, than
∆E∆AE
≥ h … (4).
Let
us now consider the galaxies born in AE. Premović [3] also derived the
relationship between the distance DG of an AE galaxy and its age AG
DG = cAG.
By applying the similar
mathematical procedure as above for the BE case, we find that
∆E∆AG
≥ h … (5)
where
∆E is the accompanying change in energy ∆E.
Therefore,
eqn. (4) and eqn. (5) can be interpreted as the “cosmic” energy-time
uncertainty relations for the BE and AE galaxies, respectively.
References
{1} P. I. Premović, Distant
galaxies in the non-expanding (Euclidean) Universe: the light speed redshift. The General
Science Journal, December 2021.
{2} P. I. Premović, The age of the “megamaser” galaxies in the Big Bang
Universe. The General Science Journal, December 2021.
{3} P. I.
Premović, A simple way to
show space-time expansion. The General Science Journal, December 2021.
{4} P. I. Premović, The Big Bang Universe
and the Principle of energy conservation. The General Science Journal, December
2021.
In what follows, we will define nearby galaxies as those whose redshift zG is from 0.001 to 0.1 (or 0.001 ≤ zG ≤ 0.1) and distant galaxies with zG > 0.1. Of course, there is no sharp line between nearby and distant galaxies.
For example nearby “megamaser” galaxy” NGC 1052 (with a negligible peculiar
motion) is at distance 65 Mly [3, and references therein]. Suppose that this
galaxy emits a spectral line at about 650 nm (or 6.5 ×10-7 m) then, using the eqn.
(2), we calculate that N ≈ 1030.
No comments:
Post a Comment